MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251499963 · doi:10.1086/433063

<i>The Heretic in Darwin’s Court: The Life of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>Ross A  Slotten<i>. New York: Columbia University Press.</i> $39.50. ix + 602 p + 24 pl; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐231‐13010‐4. 2004.<i>An Elusive Victorian: The Evolution of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>Martin  Fichman<i>. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press.</i> $40.00. x + 382 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐226‐24613‐2. 2004.<i>The Forgotten Naturalist: In Search of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>John G  Wilson. <i>Kew (Australia): Arcadia/Australian Scholarly Publishing Pty Ltd.</i> AU$38.00. xvi + 263 p + 16 pl; ill.; index. ISBN: 1‐875606‐72‐6. [This book was previously reviewed in <i>QRB</i> 78(2):212 by the reviewer.] 2000.

2005· review· en· W4251499963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Review of Biology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEvolution and Science Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Queen (butterfly)HeresyCharles darwinPublishingGreenwichHistoryEnvironmental ethicsArt historyClassicsPhilosophyTheologyDarwinismLawPolitical scienceBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0120.001
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it