<i>The Heretic in Darwin’s Court: The Life of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>Ross A Slotten<i>. New York: Columbia University Press.</i> $39.50. ix + 602 p + 24 pl; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐231‐13010‐4. 2004.<i>An Elusive Victorian: The Evolution of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>Martin Fichman<i>. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press.</i> $40.00. x + 382 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐226‐24613‐2. 2004.<i>The Forgotten Naturalist: In Search of Alfred Russel Wallace</i>. <i>By </i>John G Wilson. <i>Kew (Australia): Arcadia/Australian Scholarly Publishing Pty Ltd.</i> AU$38.00. xvi + 263 p + 16 pl; ill.; index. ISBN: 1‐875606‐72‐6. [This book was previously reviewed in <i>QRB</i> 78(2):212 by the reviewer.] 2000.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".