MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4251523207 · doi:10.5194/acp-2020-315

Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions

2020· preprint· en· W4251523207 on OpenAlexaff
Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Chelsea R. Thompson, K. C. Aikin, T. Campos, Hannah Clark, R. Commane, Bruce C. Daube, Glenn S. Diskin, James W. Elkins, R. S. Gao, Audrey Gaudel, Eric J. Hintsa, B. J. Johnson, Rigel Kivi, Kathryn McKain, F. L. Moore, D. D. Parrish, Richard Querel, Eric Ray, Ricardo Sánchez, Colm Sweeney, D. W. Tarasick, Anne M. Thompson, V. Thouret, J. C. Witte, S. C. Wofsy, Thomas B. Ryerson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean CommissionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTroposphereEnvironmental scienceTropospheric ozoneAtmospheric sciencesStratosphereClimatologyNorthern HemisphereOzoneMeteorologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Ozone is a key constituent of the troposphere where it drives photochemical processes, impacts air quality, and acts as a climate forcer. Large-scale in situ observations of ozone commensurate with the grid resolution of current Earth system models are necessary to validate model outputs and satellite retrievals. In this paper, we examine measurements from the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom, 4 deployments in 2016–2018) and the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO; 5 deployments in 2009–2011) experiments, two global-scale airborne campaigns covering the Pacific (HIPPO and ATom) and Atlantic (ATom) basins. ATom and HIPPO represent the first global-scale, vertically resolved measurements of O3 distributions throughout the troposphere, with HIPPO sampling the Pacific basin and ATom sampling both the Pacific and Atlantic basins. Given the relatively limited temporal resolution of these two campaigns, we first compare ATom and HIPPO ozone data to longer-term observational records to establish the representativeness of our dataset. We show that these two airborne campaigns captured on average 53, 54, and 38 % of the ozone variability in the marine boundary layer, free troposphere, and upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS), respectively, at nine well-established ozonesonde sites. Additionally, ATom captured the most frequent ozone concentrations measured by regular commercial aircraft flights in the northern Atlantic UTLS. We then use the repeated vertical profiles carried out during these two campaigns to provide a global-scale picture of tropospheric ozone spatial and vertical distributions throughout the remote troposphere. We highlight a clear hemispheric gradient, with greater ozone in the northern hemisphere consistent with greater precursor emissions. We also show that the ozone distribution below 8 km was similar in the extra-tropics of the Atlantic and Pacific basins due to zonal circulation patterns. However, twice as much ozone was found in the tropical Atlantic than in the tropical Pacific, due to well-documented dynamical patterns transporting continental air masses over the Atlantic. We finally show that the seasonal variability of tropospheric ozone over the Pacific and the Atlantic basins is driven by transported continental plumes and photochemistry, and the vertical distribution is driven by photochemistry and mixing with stratospheric air. This new dataset is essential for improving our understanding of both ozone production and loss processes in remote regions, as well as the influence of anthropogenic emissions on baseline ozone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→