MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251539818 · doi:10.4200/jjhg1948.57.195

Managing Pilgrimage

2005· article· en· W4251539818 on OpenAlex
Hiroshi Shimazaki, Philip L. Wagner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Human Geography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilgrimageHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The worldwide phenomenon of pilgrimage-the difficult pious journey to some sacred place-everywhere needs expert management to deal with constantly changing external and internal challenges to ensure continuance and legitimacy of devotions. Relevant influences include location, internal facilities, conditions of travel, the spatial and temporal regime of pilgrim performance, accommodation and security of shrine visitors, and even doctrinal changes. The varied individuals and agencies entrusted with managing pilgrimages seek to modify their physical sites, ritual practices, and other features in order to anticipate or adapt to shifting selective conditions in a sort of evolutionary transformative process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it