MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Relation between Stratigraphic Elements, Pressure Regime, and Hydrocarbons in the Alberta Deep Basin (with Emphasis on Select Mesozoic Units)

2001· article· en· W4251577328 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsPetrel Robertson Consulting (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMesozoicStructural basinPaleontologyRelation (database)GeochemistryData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An integrated stratigraphic and hydrodynamic study of deeply buried Mesozoic units in more than 2000 wells located within the Alberta basin illustrates the relation between reservoir architecture and pressures, contrasts the nature of regional fluid systems within select units of economic importance, and tests published models of fluid behavior in the Alberta basin. We evaluated these aspects for two Mesozoic intervals (Jurassic Fernie Formation and Lower Cretaceous Viking Formation) and, for comparative purposes, a Paleozoic unit (Devonian Nisku Formation). The Nisku Formation is a normally pressured unit where fluid pressures increase systematically with depth in areally extensive carbonates and overpressured zones are restricted to locally developed shale basins. Gas columns have associated downdip aquifers, and water becomes increasingly fresh to the west, closer to regional recharge. Fernie and Viking units pass westward from underpressured, gas-saturated units downdip of aquifers to normally and overpressured zones, and pressures in excess of hydrostatic occur at depths below about 2600 m (8530 ft). Fernie and Viking units have contrasting styles of reservoir distribution. The former are productive from blanket units, whereas Viking production is overwhelmingly obtained from lenticular channel fills. The westward change from subnormal to supranormal pressures in Mesozoic units is associated with the lowest heat flow values and highest geothermal gradients in Mesozoic units of west-central Alberta. In the Viking, the highest pressures are associated with an increase in porosity due to grain dissolution. This article provides several implications for understanding the nature and distribution of hydrocarbons in the Alberta deep basin. Although most studies of Mesozoic units of the Alberta deep basin have emphasized the underpressured nature of reservoirs, a pressure continuum occurs that links shallow, underpressured units with deeper, supranormally pressured zones. The maintenance of supranormal pressures at depth is due to effective vertical and lateral seals located in a zone of low heat flow but high geothermal gradient. Porosity does not progressively decline with depth in all Mesozoic units. Sandstone units containing large numbers of rock fragments and feldspars may display an increase in porosity values with depth where there are high temperatures and pressures. Highly porous sandstones may form reservoirs that have high gas deliverabilities and reserves; therefore, many lithofeldspathic Paleozoic and Mesozoic sandstones in the deepest parts of the Alberta basin may be prospective for petroleum. Generalized models of pressure distribution and maintenance that do not account for reservoir architecture and composition may overlook those apparently anomalous situations that have significant economic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207