MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251594747 · doi:10.1002/9781119975489.ch7

Lubrication Systems

2011· other· en· W4251594747 on OpenAlexaff
Bernie MacIsaac, Roy Langton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsGastops (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLubricationLubricantBearing (navigation)Mechanical engineeringViscosityMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The basic principles of lubrication, friction and wear are examined for simple journal and rolling-element bearings where it is recognized that bearing failures will ultimately occur as a result of surface damage and fatigue even in ideal circumstances. The concept of Elasto-Hydro-Dynamics (EHD) as an operating region is described as a means of optimizing the bearing lubrication and thermal properties of a design. This leads logically to a recognition of the importance of lubricant viscosity and its effect on the lubrication efficiency. The major attributes of both mineral and synthetic lubrication oils are described including viscosity, oxidation (coking) and foam-ability. The lubrication system typical of the modern gas turbine engine is described where high pressure oil is supplied to the main engine bearing sumps and accessory gearbox. The oil scavenged from the sumps is then cooled and de-aerated before being re-pressurized and filtered prior to returning to the engine bearings. System design considerations are discussed including monitoring of key parameters such as temperature pressure and filter delta-P. Oil debris capture via chip detectors is described together with the more advanced inductive debris monitoring technology which can detect both ferrous and non-ferrous particles in the oil and distinguish between particle sizes. Finally comments on the challenges of ceramic bearing technology are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207