MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251603091 · doi:10.13188/2328-1723.1000016

Aptamer Utility in Sensor Platformsfor the Detection of Toxins and Heavy Metals

2017· article· en· W4251603091 on OpenAlexaff
Olasunkanmi O. Olaoye, Richard A. Manderville

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Toxins · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAptamerHeavy metalsChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBiologyMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nucleic acid research has expanded in recent years through the development of an in vitro methodology for the derivation of functional nucleic acids, capable of binding to specific targets with high specificity and sensitivity. These activities are similar to those of antibodies, yet the single-stranded oligonucleotide, called aptamer, can be readily created on a large-scale using solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis. This relative ease of synthesis has made aptamers a highly versatile tool for the detection of important targets for applications in imaging, diagnostics and therapeutics. Aptamers are able to show high fidelity to specific targets due to their selective affinities. They undergo structural alteration and topological changes when they bind to specific targets and most sensors using aptamers today leverage on this characteristic to record a detectable signal. The use of aptamers in modern applications is vast and cannot possibly be covered in a single review. This review explicitly focuses on DNA aptamers used for detecting toxins and heavy metals, and outlines their utility in contemporary sensor designs, and their future prospects as analytical tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ToxinsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207