MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4251623747 · doi:10.1002/9781444398854.ch85

Sperm Retrieval in Cancerous Testes

2012· other· en· W4251623747 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Aldousari, Armand Zini

Bibliographic record

VenueAssisted Reproduction Techniques · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsSt Mary's Hospital CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSperm RetrievalSperm bankTesticular cancerMedicineSpermMalignancyGynecologyInfertilityFertilityFertility preservationOrchiectomyAndrologyTesticular sperm extractionMale infertilityCancerUrologyPregnancyAzoospermiaBiologyInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in young men. Patients should be counseled about the potential for infertility, the reproductive consequences of cancer therapy and the available fertility treatment options, and should be advised to bank sperm prior to systemic therapy for testicular cancer. Patients who did not bank sperm or who are azoospermic should be offered sperm retrieval at the time of radical inguinal orchiectomy. Frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa have been used successfully in ICSI cycles with pregnancy rates comparable to that using ejaculated spermatozoa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssisted Reproduction Techniques→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→