10.5840/croatjphil20044221
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Stub record whose 'abstract' is Crossref boilerplate about erroneously created DOIs; no research content.
The record is a contextual notice about DOI metadata and deletion procedures.
Unattached DOI error record with no real scholarly object to classify.
Abstract
This DOI is not currently attached to any metadata records. DOIs can’t actually ever be deleted (they’re persistent), but sometimes our members create DOIs in error. We do have a process to approximate deletion which we follow only in rare cases where the DOI has been genuinely created in error, and most crucially, if the DOI has never been published anywhere online or in print and never otherwise distributed to or communicated with anyone (authors, readers, reviewers, etc.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- Time to knit
- Topic
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Field
- Arts and Humanities
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Geology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes