Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
David Barnett, Rainer Werner Fassbinder and the German Theatre , reviewed by Markus Wessendorf Linda Ben-Zvi, Susan Glaspell: Her Life and Times , reviewed by Sharon Friedman Laura Bradley, Brecht and Political Theatre: The Mother on Stage , reviewed by Sean Carney Daphne A. Brooks, Bodies in Dissent: Spectacular Performances of Race and Freedom, 1850–1910, reviewed by Lori Harrison-Kahan Matthew S. Buckley, Tragedy Walks the Streets: The French Revolution in the Making of Modern Drama , reviewed by Ehren Fordyce S.E. Gontarski And Anthony Uhlmann, eds., Beckett after Beckett , reviewed by David Pattie John Heilpern, John Osborne: A Patriot for Us , reviewed by Luc Gilleman Katie N. Johnson, Sisters in Sin: Brothel Drama in America, 1900–1920 , reviewed by Kim Marra Scott Mcmillin, The Musical as Drama , reviewed by John M. Clum Toril Moi, Henrik Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism: Art, Theater, reviewed by Kirsten Shepherd-Barr
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.448 | 0.451 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".