MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251714002 · doi:10.4000/cem.7572

CBMA - Chartae Burgundiae Medii Aevi. III. Systèmes d’interrogation et recherches sur les fonds diplomatiques bourguignons

2008· article· fr· W4251714002 on OpenAlex
Eliana Magnani, Marie-José Gasse-Grandjean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin du Centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInterrogationHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comme chaque année, une journée d’études sera consacrée au programme de recherche et à la base de données des CBMA. Pour cette troisième rencontre, il sera question des avancées dans les systèmes d’interrogation de la base, en cours d’élaboration, avec l’application Philologic (par Alain Guerreau, CNRS/Paris) et dans la plateforme TELMA, en collaboration avec l’École nationale des chartes (par Florence Clavaud). Nous discuterons également des projets d’édition électronique en cours (Acey, Rei...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it