MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251754093 · doi:10.1029/eost2008eo52

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union Volume 89, Number 52, 23 December 2008

2008· article· en· W4251754093 on OpenAlexafffund
Corwin Q. Edwards, Joerg Heil, K Hubeny, John Laird, F Mcandrews, Brian J. McCarthy, T Medioli, David Moore, Michael O. Garcia, Dominique Weis, D. Geist, L. Swinnard, T. A. Bianco, A. F. Flinders, Brian Taylor, Bruce Appelgate, C. Blay, Diane Hanano, Nobre Silva, Terry Naumann, K. S. Harpp, Branden Christensen, Linda Sciaroni, T. Tagami

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of CambridgeNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)GeologyGeophysicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207