MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251763918 · doi:10.3917/rfdc.088.0781

Jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel Octobre 2010-mars 2011

2012· article· fr· W4251763918 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Philippe, Anne Marceau, Sophie Hutier, Annabelle Pena, Marthe Fatin-Rouge Stéfanini, Sandrine Marcilloux-Giummarra, André Roux, Alexis Le Quinio, Laurence Gay, Maryse Badel, Xavier Bioy, Éric Oliva, Gilles Mathieu, Jean-Baptiste Perrier, Sacha Raoult, Sofian Anane, Catherine Tzutzuiano

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de droit constitutionnel · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Politics and Economy
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudenceMars Exploration ProgramPolitical sciencePhilosophyAstrobiologyLawPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article disponible en ligne à l'adresse https:/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de droit constitutionnelSame topicGlobal Politics and EconomyFrench-language works237,207