Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On behalf of the International Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (International ASET Inc.), the organizing committee would like to welcome you to the 6 th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science (EECSS'20).Due to the evolving COVID-19 outbreak and corresponding issues in border entry in European countries, the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science (EECSS'20) which was supposed to be held in Prague, Czech Republic will be held virtually instead on August 13 -15, 2020.EECSS is aimed to become one of the leading international annual congresses in the fields of electrical engineering and computer systems and science.This congress will provide excellent opportunities to the scientists, researchers, industrial engineers, and university students to present their research achievements and to develop new collaborations and partnerships with experts in the field.While each conference consists of an individual and separate theme, the 5 conferences share considerable overlap, which prompted the organization of this congress.The goal of this undertaking is to bring together experts in each of the specialized fields, and at the same time allow for cross pollinations and sharing of ideas from the other closely related research areas.We thank you for your participation and contribution to the 6 th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science (EECSS'20).We wish you a very successful and enjoyable experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.266 | 0.231 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".