Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to obtain data and information on 1) income levels 2) educational conditions 3) living conditions 4) health conditions in Non-Metallic Mineral Mining in the Village of Gunung Sarik, Kuranji District, Padang City..This research uses a mixed method, which is a method that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study population was Non-Metallic Mineral Miners in Gunung Sarik Sub-District, Kuranji District, Padang City. The quantitative research sample was 66 workers. Qualitative data collection techniques using observation and questionnaire distribution. Whereas the qualitative research sample is the owner of a CV of 1 person. For qualitative data collection techniques using interviews.The results showed that: (1) the level of income of workers at the mine was Rp 2,500,000- Rp 3,500,000 per month (65.1%) (2). the education conditions of mine workers are relatively low with the majority of junior high school graduates (39.3%). (3) the status of houses occupied by mining workers almost all belong to sendri (50%), almost every house is equipped with PLN electricity. (4) The health condition of mine workers is very good in working activities (48.5%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".