Advancing Practice, Instruction, and Innovation Through Informatics (APIII 2006): Scientific Session Presentation Abstracts and Scientific Poster Session Abstracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Scientific session presentations ( http://apiii.upmc.edu/abstracts/sci_schedule.html ) and scientific poster sessions ( http://apiii.upmc.edu/abstracts/eposter.html ) were conducted at the 11th annual international conference on Advancing Practice, Instruction, and Innovation Through Informatics (APIII 2006) on August 15–18, 2006, at the Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre, located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. One of the course directors was Michael J. Becich, MD, PhD, professor of pathology and information sciences and telecommunications, chairman of the Department of Biomedical Informatics at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa. Also serving as course directors were John R. Gilbertson, MD, director of Pathology Informatics, Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio; Walter Henricks, MD, director of Pathology Informatics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and Bruce McManus, MD, PhD, professor and codirector, The iCAPTURE Centre, University of British Columbia–St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.230 | 0.060 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".