MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251855391 · doi:10.1002/3527600434.eap649

Optoelectronics

2005· other· en· W4251855391 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuedigital Encyclopedia of Applied Physics · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplexerOptoelectronicsMultiplexingLight fieldOpticsOptical add-drop multiplexerOptical communicationWavelengthMaterials scienceWavelength-division multiplexingComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsOptical performance monitoring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It is useful to view today's optoelectronics in terms of various functional categories, most important of which are the generation of light, modulation of light, transmission of light and its connection between devices, amplification of light, switching of light, isolation of light, filtering of light, wavelength multiplexing and demultiplexing of light, and detection of light. The corresponding devices that implement these functions are light emitters (or light sources), modulators, waveguides and connectors, optical amplifiers, optical switches, optical isolators, optical filters, multiplexers and demultiplexers, and detectors. This introductory article reviews the principles of operation and characteristics of a number of selected devices to provide a general introduction to the field of optoelectronics with an emphasis on optical communications—a major area of application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it