MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251857918 · doi:10.1002/047134608x.w3233.pub2

Triboelectrification

2014· other· en· W4251857918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTriboelectric effectCharge (physics)Contact electrificationEngineering physicsCurrent (fluid)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triboelectrification, more accurately known as contact charging, is used to describe the exchange of electrostatic charge between two surfaces when they are brought into contact. This article reviews the various charging methods that are used to charge materials and discusses some practical applications of such charging. In addition cases where the charges may lead to nuisances and hazards are described. The various methods whereby the charge may be measured are summarized and the limitations discussed. The main part of the paper deals with mechanisms of contact charging and the state of our current understanding of the theory behind the process and the factors that affect the magnitude of the charge transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it