Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welchen Einfluss haben Globalisierungsprozesse auf Autonomiebestrebungen? Diese Arbeit leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion, indem sie den Zusammenhang anhand der Autonomiebestrebungen in Südtirol, Flandern und Quebec untersucht. Auf den drei Ebenen International, National und Regional zeigt die Autorin auf, wie ein neuer Gesellschaftskonflikt zwischen Globalisierungsbefürwortern und Globalisierungsskeptikern entsteht, der sich auf innerstaatliche Prozesse auswirken kann. Abbilder dieses Phänomens sind der Aufstieg der diversen populistischen Parteien auf beiden Seiten des Spektrums und der Rückzug ins Nationale oder Regionale. In Regionen mit Autonomiebewegung wachsen gleichzeitig die regionale Homogenität und Identität in Abgrenzung zum Staat. Weisen diese außerdem eine Art quasi-staatliche Konfiguration auf, so führen Globalisierungsprozesse zu zunehmenden Autonomiebestrebungen oder sogar zur Sezession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.479 | 0.256 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".