MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251932647 · doi:10.1260/0957456011498470

UK Government Publishes Latest Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Figures — Vibration White Finger Half of Total

2001· article· en· W4251932647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNoise & Vibration Worldwide · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)MedicineActuarial scienceGerontologyOperations managementEngineeringForensic engineeringDemographyMedical emergencyBusinessGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

March 8th saw the release of figures providing information on new claims and first diagnosis of prescribed diseases in Great Britain in the fourth quarter of 2000. The Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB) quarterly statistics provide analysis of the characteristics of the Industrial Injuries, new claims and first diagnosed disease assessments for the quarter. The types of analysis include numbers and ages of claimants and percentage disablement of newly diagnosed prescribed diseases. Annual assessments provide detailed characteristics of the people receiving IIDB at the end of each year, including individuals by specific disease or accident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNoise & Vibration WorldwideSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207