MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4251936863 · doi:10.1107/s0108270104033621

Further developments for<i>Acta Crystallographica Section C</i>

2004· article· en· W4251936863 on OpenAlexaff
George Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Computer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acta Crystallographica Section C continues to specialize in the rapid publication of highquality studies of novel and challenging crystal and molecular structures. Publication times have continued their downward trend, with the majority of technically correct and well written papers appearing online (http://journals.iucr.org/c/) within two months of submission. In 2004, Section C published 533 papers (41 inorganic, 227 metal-organic and 285 organic) in a total of 1686 pages a 14% increase in papers and pages over 2003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure CommunicationsSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207