Coins, bones and lamps from the Swedish excavations at Carthage - JOHN LUND, RITA LARJE, HARALD NILSSON, with foreword by Kristian Göransson and epilogue by Birgitta Sander, <i>CARTHAGE</i> II. THE SWEDISH MISSION TO CARTHAGE. PART OF THE UNESCO PROJECT “POUR SAUVER CARTHAGE”. RESULTS OF THE SWEDISH EXCAVATIONS 1979–1983 DIRECTED BY BIRGITTA SANDER AND CARL-GUSTAF SYRENIUS FOR THE MUSEUM OF MEDITERRANEAN AND NEAR EASTERN ANTIQUITIES (MEDELHAVSMUSEET) IN STOCKHOLM (Acta Instituti Romani Regni Sueciae, ser. in 4° 54:2; Stockholm2017). Pp. 235, many figs. including colour. ISSN 0081-993X; ISBN 978-91-7042-185-3.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coins, bones and lamps from the Swedish excavations at Carthage - JOHN LUND, RITA LARJE, HARALD NILSSON, with foreword by Kristian Göransson and epilogue by Birgitta Sander, CARTHAGE II. THE SWEDISH MISSION TO CARTHAGE. PART OF THE UNESCO PROJECT “POUR SAUVER CARTHAGE”. RESULTS OF THE SWEDISH EXCAVATIONS 1979–1983 DIRECTED BY BIRGITTA SANDER AND CARL-GUSTAF SYRENIUS FOR THE MUSEUM OF MEDITERRANEAN AND NEAR EASTERN ANTIQUITIES (MEDELHAVSMUSEET) IN STOCKHOLM (Acta Instituti Romani Regni Sueciae, ser. in 4° 54:2; Stockholm 2017). Pp. 235, many figs. including colour. ISSN 0081-993X; ISBN 978-91-7042-185-3. - Volume 33
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.182 | 0.107 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".