MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252027460 · doi:10.1201/9780203634523-5

Arsenic in vegetables

2003· book-chapter· en· W4252027460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in food and nutrition toxicity · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicDye analysis and toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soil arsenic concentrations in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada, are above national averages as a result of both the natural geology of the region and the release of arsenic-containing waste during local gold mining processes. The presence of elevated soil arsenic concentrations raised concerns about the safety of arsenic levels in residentially grown vegetables. Accordingly, the arsenic levels in voluntarily donated residential vegetables and fruits were studied. The possibility that residential soil had been historically augmented with arsenic contaminated waste from the mines prompted the study of worst-case scenario gardens. For the latter study, two gardens were constructed: one on mine property, and one using soil from a nearby lakeshore that was contaminated with arsenic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in food and nutrition toxicitySame topicDye analysis and toxicityFrench-language works237,207