Academia y hablantes frente al sexismo lingüístico: ideologías lingüísticas en la prensa española
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: Este trabajo analiza el modo en que la prensa espaola se hizo eco del debate en torno al sexismo lingstico tras la publicacin en marzo de 2012 del Informe de la RAE titulado "Sexismo lingstico y visibilidad de la mujer". El estudio se centra en las ideologas lingsticas expresadas por Academia y hablantes en dos de los principales peridicos de Espaa, El Pas y ABC; concretamente, se presta atencin a los argumentos con que las distintas voces sustentan su opinin acerca del lenguaje sexista. Los ejes sobre los que gira el debate y se construyen discursivamente ideologas lingsticas son, principalmente, a) el empleo del masculino genrico, b) el sentimiento de inclusin o exclusin en la lengua por parte de las mujeres y c) la consideracin sexista de la lengua y de sus hablantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".