Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mary F. Brewer, Staging Whiteness, reviewed by Emily Colborn-Roxworthy Maggie B. Gale and Vive Gardner, eds., Auto/biography and Identity: Women, Theatre and Performance, reviewed by Maria DiCenzo John J. White, Bertolt Brecht’s Dramatic Theory, reviewed by Steve Giles John Tulloch, Shakespeare and Chekhov in Performance and Reception: Theatrical Events and Their Audiences, reviewed by Stuart Young Charlotte M. Canning, The Most American Thing in America: Circuit Chautauqua as Performance, reviewed by Rosemarie K. Bank Dorothy Chansky, Composing Ourselves: The Little Theatre Movement and the American Audience, reviewed by Rosemarie K. Bank Enoch Brater, ed., Arthur Miller’s America: Theater and Culture in a Time of Change, reviewed by Brenda Murphy Tenessee Williams, Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays, reviewed by Brian Parker Tennessee Williams, Candles to the Sun, reviewed by Brian Parker Arnold Aronson, Looking into the Abyss: Essays on Scenography, reviewed by Christopher Baugh
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.433 | 0.450 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".