Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strategic Thinking in Criminal Intelligence; Jerry H. Ratcliffe (Ed.), (2004) Annandale, New South Wales, Australia: The Federation Press, 216pp, ISBN 1862874905 Will the Circle be Unbroken? Aboriginal Communities, Restorative Justice, and the Challenge of Conflict and Change; Jane Dickinson-Gilmore and Carol La Prairie, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0802086748 In Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime; Paul Cromwell, (2006) Los Angeles: Roxbury, 340pp, ISBN 1931719551 Statistics in Criminology and Criminal Justice; Analysis and Interpretation; J. Walker and S. Maddan, (2005) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 423pp, ISBN 0763730718 Why Do Criminals Offend? A General Theory of Crime and Delinquency; Robert Agnew, (2005) Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company, 246 pp, ISBN 1931719349
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".