MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252074383 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2018.8447703

IIR Filter Design Using Multiobjective Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization

2018· article· en· W4252074383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassbandStopbandInfinite impulse responseChebyshev filterMinimaxFinite impulse responseComputer scienceMinificationLow-pass filter2D FiltersHigh-pass filterFilter (signal processing)Digital filterFilter designControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsBand-pass filterArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringEngineeringComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an Euclidean-distance-based multiobjective teaching-learning-based optimization (MOTLBO) is applied to the design of cascade-form IIR digital filters. Minimization of the least-pth minimax errors in passband and stopband magnitude responses and passband group delay response are performed. The lowpass and highpass digital filter design results of the Euclidean-distance-based MOTLBO approach compares favorably with the recent results obtained by other optimization methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it