MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 16992: Changes in Physical Activity and the Risk of Incident Heart Failure: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

2015· article· en· W4252096975 on OpenAlexaff
Roberta Florido, Lucia Kwak, Mariana Lazo, Vijay Nambi, Haitham M. Ahmed, Sheila M. Hegde, Gary Gerstenblith, Roger S. Blumenthal, Christie M. Ballantyne, Elizabeth Selvin, Aaron R. Folsom, Josef Coresh, Chiadi E. Ndumele

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelAtherosclerosis Risk in CommunitiesPhysical activityConfoundingHeart failureMetabolic equivalentInternal medicineLower riskConfidence intervalDemographyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Higher physical activity is associated with a lower risk of heart failure (HF). The effects of changes in physical activity levels over time on HF risk are largely uncharacterized. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that persistently recommended and increasing levels of physical activity over a 6-year period are associated with reduced HF risk. Methods: We evaluated 11,185 ARIC participants (mean age 60; 57% female, 23% black) free of CVD at Visit 3 (1993-95) with available physical activity data at Visit 1 (1987-89) and Visit 3. Exercise physical activity was assessed using a modified Baecke questionnaire and categorized according to AHA recommendations: recommended (≥150 min/wk of moderate + vigorous activity or ≥75 min/wk of vigorous activity); intermediate (1-149 min/wk of moderate + vigorous activity or 1-74 min/wk of vigorous activity); or poor (no moderate or vigorous activity). We created cross-categories of physical activity at Visit 1 and Visit 3. The primary outcome was incident HF occurring after Visit 3 through 12/31/12. We constructed Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for incident HF associated with each cross-category of physical activity at Visit 1 and Visit 3, adjusting for confounders. Results: Over a median of 18 years, there were 1,625 HF events. Compared to those with poor activity at both visits (reference), those with persistently recommended activity had the lowest HF risk (Table; HR 0.67 95% CI: 0.58-0.78). Additionally, at each level of baseline physical activity, increasing physical activity over time was associated with decreased HF risk: an increase from poor to recommended activity was linked to a 22% lower risk of HF. Conclusion: While maintaining recommended activity levels is associated with the lowest HF risk, initiating and increasing physical activity over time is also linked to risk reduction. Augmenting physical activity in middle age may be an important component of strategies to prevent HF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207