Mechanochemical Synthesis of Short DNA Fragments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the general and rapid synthesis of short DNA fragments of controllable sequence and length using multi-step, one-pot mechanochemical reactions, without bulk solvent or the need to isolate intermediates. We demonstrate, for the first time, the multi-step ball milling synthesis of DNA dimers and trimers via phosphoramidite and H-phosphonate chemistries. The use of mechanochemistry allowed for coupling of phosphoramidite monomers to the 5'-hydroxyl group of nucleosides, iodine/water oxidation of the resulting phosphite triester linkage, and removal of the 5'-dimethoxy (DMTr) protecting group in situ and in good yields (up to 60% over three steps) to produce DNA dimers in one-pot manner. Sulphurization of phosphite triester linkages was possible using elemental sulfur yielding the corresponding phosphorothioate DNA dimers in good yield (up to 80% over two steps). By using H-phosphonate chemistry under milling conditions, it was possible to couple, protect the H-phosphonate linkage, and remove the 5'-DMTr protecting group in situ, enabling an one-pot process with good yields comparable to existing solvent-based procedures (up to 65% over three steps, or ca. 87% per step). This work opens the door to creation of solvent-free methodologies for the assembly of complex DNA and RNA therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".