Effects of low temperature, cold shock, and various carbon sources on esterase and lipase activities and exopolysaccharide production by a psychrotrophic<i>Acinetobacter</i>sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activities of isocitrate lyase, esterase, and lipase by the psychrotrophic Acinetobacter sp. strain HH1-1 were monitored during incubation at 25°C, 5°C, and after a 25°C to 5°C down shift in growth temperature. During growth at 25°C, isocitrate lyase activity was detected in cell-free extracts, but at 5°C and after cold shock, activity was measured primarily in the cell culture supernatant. Strain HH1-1 produced two cell-associated esterases and an extracellular esterase and lipase. Activities of the extracellular esterase and lipase were reduced when cells were grown at 5°C and after cold shock. In contrast, an increased synthesis of a 53-kDa cell-associated esterase was observed 50 h after cold shock. An extracellular polysaccharide was also produced, indicated by a decrease in surface tension in cell culture supernatant when cells were incubated at 25°C; but like extracellular enzyme activity, production of the exopolymer was reduced when cells were subjected to low temperatures. These results indicated that the intracellular enzyme, isocitrate lyase, leaked out of the cell after cold shock and during growth at 5°C. The increased activity of a cell-associated esterase suggested this enzyme is required for growth at low temperatures. In contrast, activities of extracellular lipolytic enzymes and production of an extracellular polysaccharide were negatively affected at the lower temperatures.Key words: Acinetobacter, cold shock, esterase, lipase, exopolysaccharide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".