MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252159045 · doi:10.5383/ijtee.13.01.005

Prospects of Wind Energy for Power Generation in University of Benin

2016· article· en· W4252159045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeibull distributionWind speedWind powerEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyMeteorologyWind profile power lawAtmospheric sciencesStatisticsMathematicsEngineeringGeographyPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind is a renewable energy resource by nature. It is clean, abundant, inexhaustible and environmentally friendly. Essentially, this study investigated the prospects of wind energy for power generation in University of Benin. Wind data from Jan 31st – Dec 31st 2013 (at 10m height) was collected from National Centre for Energy and Environment, University of Benin. Accordingly, the annual and monthly wind speed and density are estimated using the 2- parameter Weibull probability density function. From the analysis, results obtained shows that the highest mean wind speed of 1.975m/s occurred in March and the lowest monthly mean speed of 0.977m/s occurred in November. Also, the annual mean wind speed is 1.496m/s while the annual mean power density based on Weibull distribution function is 2.692W/m2 . Further results shows that the mean annual most probable wind speed and wind speed carrying maximum energy are 1.535m/s and 1.761m/s respectively. Thus, it is recommended that the institution can tap on the available wind power potential to augment its power supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental EngineeringSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207