MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252185183 · doi:10.5380/rcc.v1i1.40278

MORTE, CULPA E MEDO. A ANGÚSTIA COLETIVA NO PRINCÍPIO DA MODERNIDADE

2010· article· pt· W4252185183 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Frasato Bastos

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Cadernos de Clio · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsCampus Notre-Dame-de-Foy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo é parte do primeiro capítulo de minha monografia de bacharelado intitulada "Tempos de Angústia - Erasmo e Lutero no Início da Modernidade". O objetivo de minha pesquisa é relacionar o Humanismo Cristão e a Reforma Religiosa, partindo do debate historiográfico que reconhece serem ambos respostas às necessidades de seu tempo, marcado por uma forte angústia coletiva experimentada no período de transição do Medievo para a Modernidade, mas também pela atitude intelectual de conhecimento e ação no mundo. É este contexto que abordamos neste artigo, enfatizando os elementos que podem nos ajudar a compreender essa angústia coletiva.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Cadernos de ClioSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207