Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Globalization, Critique and Social Theory: Diagnoses and Challenges (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 33), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. xi. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0278-120420150000033018 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited J. I. (Hans) Bakker Department of Sociology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada James E. Block Department of Political Science, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA Harry F. Dahms Department of Sociology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA Asafa Jalata Department of Sociology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA Courtney Jung Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Reha Kadakal Department of Sociology, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA Daniel Krier Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA Moishe Postone Department of History, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA David Norman Smith Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA William J. Swart Department of Sociology, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD, USA Michael J. Thompson Department of Political Science, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA Mark P. Worrell Department of Sociology, State University of New York Cortland, NY, USA Book Chapters Globalization, Critique and Social Theory: Diagnoses and Challenges Current Perspectives in Social Theory Globalization, Critique and Social Theory: Diagnoses and Challenges Copyright Page Dedication Editorial Board List of Contributors Introduction Part I: Elements of a Critical Theory of Globalization The Task of Critical Theory Today: Rethinking the Critique of Capitalism and its Futures Profit Maxims: Capitalism and the Common Sense of Time and Money Theorizing Modern Society as an Inverted Reality: How Critical Theory and Indigenous Critiques of Globalization Must Learn From Each Other Part II: Contributions of Critique to Social Theory The Neo-Idealist Paradigm Shift in Contemporary Critical Theory Toward a Critical Ontology of the Social: Hegel, Lukács, and the Challenge of Mediation Critical Theory and Practice: Bridging the Global and the Personal. A Lecture Call for a New Social Theory: Re-Igniting Radical Imagination Part III: Critical Applications Imperial Homunculi: The Speculative Singularities of American Hegemony (Drones, Suicide Bombers, and Rampage Killers, or, an Excursion into Durkheimian Geometry) How Legends Become Brands: The Culture Industry in the Second Enclosure Movement Thick Description, Nomological Laws and Ideal Types: Which Methodology Helps Most with Praxis? About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".