MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterizing the lateral slope of the aging female eyebrow

2013· article· en· W4252195007 on OpenAlexaff
Tanya L DeLyzer, Arjang Yazdani

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEyebrowGeologyAnatomyBiologyComputer sciencePsychologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I deal eyebrow aesthetics were first described in 1974 by Westmore (1) as a lateral arch with the apex terminating above the lateral limbus of the iris, and with medial and lateral ends of the eyebrow at the same height.Since this description, the ideal shape has been refined, and studies have shown that surgeons and patients both prefer an eyebrow shape with a lateral upward slope in which the arch apex is positioned just lateral to the lateral limbus (2-4).These aesthetics provide a framework for brow rejuvenation.The focus of brow rejuvenation procedures is on position, shape and symmetry of the eyebrows.Potential pitfalls and criticisms of surgical brow lift techniques include an 'unnatural' shape and appearance, excessive elevation of the medial eyebrow, a medial or flat apex shape and overelevation of the entire eyebrow without lowering the medial segment, yielding a surprised appearance (5-7).Because of these criticisms, surgeons performing brow rejuvenation procedures focus on reshaping the eyebrows more than repositioning.However, to accomplish this, we must fully understand the aging process at the eyebrow.Recently, Matros et al (8) studied eyebrow position in two groups of Caucasian women: 20 to 30 and 50 to 60 years of age.They found that the eyebrow overall was positioned higher in the older group and that the medial eyebrow was elevated more than the lateral eyebrow.This study helps to explain why brow lifting techniques that preferentially elevate the medial or mid portion of the eyebrow lead to an unnatural appearance.A similar study by Patil et al (9) also showed these results in a female Indian population, illustrating that this pattern transcends ethnicity.These two studies compared different points on the eyebrow between subjects, in isolation of one another and, in doing so, they do not fully capture the shape of one subject's eyebrow before comparison.To do this, we must know how one point relates to another within each eyebrow.To capture this, we can calculate the lateral slope of the eyebrow.In the present study, we set out to characterize the shape changes occurring in the aging female eyebrow, specifically the changes in slope with increasing age, by performing photographic measurements of the eyebrows of 100 women 20 to 80 years of age.We hypothesized a decrease in eyebrow slope with increasing age. MethodsResearch ethics board approval was obtained through Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (London, Ontario, HSREB# 18550E).Standardized anteroposterior facial digital photographs were obtained, after verbal consent, from a random cohort of original artiCle ©2013 Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons.All rights reserved tL deLyzer, A Yazdani.Characterizing the lateral slope of the aging female eyebrow.Can J Plast surg 2013;21(3):173-177.BACkground: Ideal eyebrow aesthetics give a framework for brow rejuvenation and surgical procedures do not always provide satisfying results.Previous studies have shown elevation of the medial brow with aging; however, they failed to characterize overall shape changes.oBJeCtive: To characterize changes in eyebrow slope with increasing age to better direct brow rejuvenation.Methods: From standardized anteroposterior facial photographs of 100 women 20 to 80 years of age, eyebrow height was measured at the medial limbus and arch apex from a mid-pupillary horizontal.The slope of the eyebrow was calculated.Using group analysis, mean height and slope were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between slope and age.resuLts: Mean slope significantly decreased from 20 to 29 years of age to 40 to 49 years of age (0.22 versus 0.12; P=0.03), and then increased between 40 and 49 years of age and ≥60 years of age (0.12 versus 0.21; P=0.05).Medial height did not change significantly, and arch apex significantly decreased between 20 and 29 years of age and 40 and 49 years of age.Regression analysis showed a quadratic relationship between age and slope, with the decrease in slope until the fifth decade of life being directly related to increasing age.After this, age was not a significant contributor to slope changes.ConCLusions: With increasing age, the slope of the eyebrow decreases until the fifth decade dependent on age.After the fifth decade, age no longer plays a significant role.Therefore, choice of brow lift technique should be carefully selected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic SurgerySame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207