MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252213629 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.acad.36027

SÍNTESE E CARACTERIZAÇÃO DE HETEROJUNÇÕES DE TITANATOS DE FE E CU CRESCIDOS SOBRE TIO2 PARA FOTÓLISE DA ÁGUA

2018· dissertation· pt· W4252213629 on OpenAlexaff
RICARDO NASCIMENTO POMBO DO AMARAL

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocatalysisMaterials scienceRutileVisible spectrumHeterojunctionTernary operationPhysisorptionChemical engineeringTitanateMineralogyAdsorptionCatalysisChemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryOptoelectronicsCeramic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years many efforts have been made to obtain materials capable of efficiently exploiting the potential of solar energy conversion.In particular, the generation of fuels by photocatalysis retains great interest due to its intrinsic properties of promoting "up-hill" reactions, with a positive free energy variation, allowing its storage in chemical compounds.The efficiency of these processes, however, is usually limited by the photoactivation of main photocatalysts in UV spectrum, wasting much of the solar energy present in visible spectrum.This work investigates the influence on photoactivation performance of heterojunctions with Fe and Cu titanate grown on TiO 2 for H2 gas production under Visible light by water-splitting.The samples were prepared according route by wet impregnation followed by post-heating treatment, where metal oxides were formed on TiO 2 particles surface with subsequent interdiffusion and formation of ternary phases of Fe 2 TiO 5 e Cu 3 TiO 4 .The materials were characterized by DRX, DSC, TGA, MEV / EDS, DRS, PLS and N 2 Physisorption techniques.The results confirmed the materials sucessful preparation, suggesting the formation of PN-type heterostructures for Fe-containing samples and a rutile-Cu doped phase for Cu-containing samples.The photocatalytic activity was evaluated in a performance test using a photoreactor system built in as part of this work.The tests allowed to identify promising preliminary results for Fe-containing samples, which demonstrated a significant photocatalytic activity in the Visible spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207