MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252268089 · doi:10.25071/0843-4182.28940

Hédi Bouraoui

2005· article· fr· W4252268089 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claudette Broucq

Bibliographic record

VenueLittéRéalité · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HMi Bouraoui.Struga suivi de Margelle d'un Festival Ed.Memoire d'encrier, ColI.Anthologie secrete, Montreal, 2003, 128 pages.1 ' 11 nup '" un, vill, d, Macedoin, OU ",i,nt chaqu, anni, un f,,-S tival international de poesie.C'est aussi le titre du dernier recueil de poemes d'Hedi Bouraoui.Comme ce pays, libere du joug totalitaire, le poete se veut authentique, lucide et sans concession, voire iconoclaste, le poeme Ceci n'est pas un poeme en etant un exemple eclatant.Apres un court prologue, clair et concis, les poemes sont presentes selon une classification qui n'est pas sans rappeler celle d'une piece de theatre.Trois actes pour une introduction, Prelude, -la prise de contact avec le pays -, Hates et Invites-le festival proprement dit -et Exit.On peur aussi evoquer la metaphore du puits, avec son centre, et la Margelle qui habille le tour par l'apport de poemes choisis.Malgre l'apparence, on y releve une cohesion par les themes et le style si particulier du poete.Avant de penetrer dans le global du poeme, I'aureur fait le point sur sa conception de la poesie moderne, qu'il veut doter d'une fonction, en faire un medium communicationnel permettant de passer de I'individuel a I'universel.Peu importe alors que les langues soient comprises ou non, ce

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittéRéalitéSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207