MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252268603 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14648058

Unit commitment using complementarity

2021· preprint· en· W4252268603 on OpenAlexaff
Steven V. Craig

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationPower system simulationComplementarity (molecular biology)Computer scienceNonlinear systemComplementarity theoryEconomic dispatchLinear programmingGenerator (circuit theory)Integer programmingGridInteger (computer science)Power (physics)MathematicsElectric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A need exists to optimally dispatch power generation to meet per-hour requirements on the power grid. This is a well documented and established problem called Unit Commitment (UC). It is commonly formulated as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP), which utilizes intelligent solvers to produce a solution with speed and accuracy. The linear nature of MILP requires linear approximations of nonlinear constraints. This work introduces the Theory of Complementarity in order to remove integer variables, resulting in a continuous rather than a discontinuous solution space. This permits use of classical solution techniques, as well as nonlinear constraints, thereby increasing accuracy. A formulation is developed to demonstrate a proof of concept of the complementarity theory as used in UC. A subset of constraints will be used and the results will be compared against an MILP optimization, for 10-and 26-generator configurations. Similar trends in generator status and total cost are noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207