MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydrogen

2000· other· en· W4252272924 on OpenAlexaff
T. A. Czuppon, S. A. Knez, D. S. Newsome

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogenHydrogen productionSteam reformingHydrogen sulfideElectrolysis of waterHydrogen storageHydrideHydrogen technologiesHigh-pressure electrolysisWater splittingChemistryAcid gasCryo-adsorptionHydrogen fuelElectrolysisWaste managementHydrogen economyCatalysisInorganic chemistrySulfurEngineeringOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrogen is one of the most important industrial commodities. Physical thermodynamic, and chemical properties are described. The chemistry of hydrogen from a commercial perspective is followed by a description of manufacturing methods. Steam reforming of hydrocarbons and partial oxidiation of hydrocarbons account for almost all hydrogen production. Other, less conventional manufacturing methods are also presented, such as hydrogen from coal, water splitting by electrolysis and chemical means, solar processes, metal–water reactions, bacteria, nuclear, and hydrogen sulfide‐splitting reactions. Hydrogen purification is reviewed. The storage of hydrogen is discussed, including conventional methods for gas and liquid storage, and possible future methods, such as in metal hydride systems and microcapsules. Analysis of hydrogen, health and safety issues, and environmental considerations are discussed. Hydrogen consumption figures are presented, and the possible future usage of hydrogen is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologySame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207