Japan's fiscal stimulus will mute tax hike impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subject The macroeconomic outlook for Japan. Significance Real GDP rose 1.8% in the April-June quarter of 2019 (seasonally adjusted, annualised), supported by household consumption and company investment, which jumped 6.1%. The one negative area was trade, where import growth had a negative effect on GDP. Nevertheless, the 6.7% jump in imports after last quarter’s collapse speaks to underlying demand strength. Part of the rise in household consumption can be attributed to the scheduled October 1 increase of the national consumption tax to 10%, from 8% currently. Impacts Washington’s trade war with Beijing threatens Japanese high-tech exports of parts used in China-assembled devices. Low unemployment rates mask considerable spare labour supply among part-time workers. Employers are not yet compelled to offer higher real wages or better working conditions. Despite offsetting fiscal stimulus, the tax rise will still shift demand from some sectors to others. Monetary policymakers will be heartened by fiscal stimulus, but still confront weak inflationary pressures indicated by a flat GDP deflator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".