MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252344233 · doi:10.1139/p02-049

Time-domain study of transient fields for a thin circular loop antenna

2002· article· en· W4252344233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTime domainTransient (computer programming)Loop (graph theory)Antenna (radio)Mathematical analysisOpticsAcousticsTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transient fields in the time-domain of a thin circular loop antenna on a two-layer conducting earth model are expressed in analytical form. In these expressions, the displacement currents both in the two-layer ground and in the air region are taken into consideration. The closed-form expressions of the time-domain are obtained as the inverse Laplace transform of the derived full-wave time-harmonic solution. These time-domain solutions are obtained as a summation of wave-guide modes plus contributions from branch cuts in the complex plane of the longitudinal wave number. Numerical examples are given to indicate the important features in the wave forms of the surface fields due to step and pulsed current excitation. These features provide the means of detecting the earth's stratification, measuring the overburden height, and determining the ratio of the conductivities of the layers. PACS Nos.: 41.20Jb, 42.25Bs, 42.25Gy, 44.05+e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it