MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252366257 · doi:10.31876/rcs.v26i3.33241

Responsabilidad social empresarial en el Ecuador: Abordaje desde la Agenda 2030/ Corporate social responsibility in Ecuador: Approach from the 2030 Agenda

2020· article· es· W4252366257 on OpenAlex
Ormaza Andrade, Juan Diego Ochoa Crespo, Quevedo Vázquez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceCorporate social responsibilityHumanitiesWelfare economicsSustainable developmentPublic administrationPublic relationsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Agenda 2030 y sus objetivos de desarrollo sostenible, así como también la responsabilidad social empresarial, buscan el cambio de paradigma que conduzca a un progreso sostenible en los ámbitos, social, económico y ambiental. Esto implica un compromiso donde actores como el Estado, comunidad civil, academia, empresas públicas y privadas, juegan un rol fundamental. El objetivo de esta investigación es describir la responsabilidad social empresarial en Ecuador a partir de la Agenda 2030. El artículo se desarrolló desde el paradigma cualitativo utilizando la revisión documental, teórica y jurídica. Como resultado, en Ecuador existe un interés acentuado de las empresas hacia el cumplimiento de la responsabilidad social, encaminando acciones cónsonas con el desarrollo sostenible y los objetivos de desarrollo declarados a nivel mundial. A pesar de ello, se requiere de mayor socialización y empoderamiento de la normativa contemplada en la Agenda 2030, para evitar el incumplimiento cabal de sus objetivos. Se concluye, que la responsabilidad social empresarial en Ecuador, responde a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sustentables y aporta elementos significativos para las dimensiones económicas, políticas, sociales, ambientales y éticas de las empresas, quienes deben asumirlas como ejes transversales de su sistema de gestión; lo cual permitirá potenciar el desarrollo del país.AbstractThe 2030 Agenda and its sustainable development goals, as well as corporate social responsibility, seek a paradigm shift that will lead to sustainable progress in the social, economic and environmental fields. This implies a commitment where actors such as the State, civil community, academia, public and private companies, play a fundamental role. The objective of this research is to describe corporate social responsibility in Ecuador from the 2030 Agenda. The article was developed from the qualitative paradigm using the documentary, theoretical and legal review. As a result, in Ecuador there is a heightened interest of companies towards the fulfillment of social responsibility, directing actions consistent with sustainable development and the declared development objectives worldwide. Despite this, greater socialization and empowerment of the regulations contemplated in the 2030 Agenda are required, to avoid the complete non-fulfillment of its objectives. It is concluded that corporate social responsibility in Ecuador responds to the Sustainable Development Goals and provides significant elements for the economic, political, social, environmental and ethical dimensions of companies, who must assume them as crosscutting axes of their management system; which will promote the development of the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207