Responsabilidad social empresarial en el Ecuador: Abordaje desde la Agenda 2030/ Corporate social responsibility in Ecuador: Approach from the 2030 Agenda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Agenda 2030 y sus objetivos de desarrollo sostenible, así como también la responsabilidad social empresarial, buscan el cambio de paradigma que conduzca a un progreso sostenible en los ámbitos, social, económico y ambiental. Esto implica un compromiso donde actores como el Estado, comunidad civil, academia, empresas públicas y privadas, juegan un rol fundamental. El objetivo de esta investigación es describir la responsabilidad social empresarial en Ecuador a partir de la Agenda 2030. El artículo se desarrolló desde el paradigma cualitativo utilizando la revisión documental, teórica y jurídica. Como resultado, en Ecuador existe un interés acentuado de las empresas hacia el cumplimiento de la responsabilidad social, encaminando acciones cónsonas con el desarrollo sostenible y los objetivos de desarrollo declarados a nivel mundial. A pesar de ello, se requiere de mayor socialización y empoderamiento de la normativa contemplada en la Agenda 2030, para evitar el incumplimiento cabal de sus objetivos. Se concluye, que la responsabilidad social empresarial en Ecuador, responde a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sustentables y aporta elementos significativos para las dimensiones económicas, políticas, sociales, ambientales y éticas de las empresas, quienes deben asumirlas como ejes transversales de su sistema de gestión; lo cual permitirá potenciar el desarrollo del país.AbstractThe 2030 Agenda and its sustainable development goals, as well as corporate social responsibility, seek a paradigm shift that will lead to sustainable progress in the social, economic and environmental fields. This implies a commitment where actors such as the State, civil community, academia, public and private companies, play a fundamental role. The objective of this research is to describe corporate social responsibility in Ecuador from the 2030 Agenda. The article was developed from the qualitative paradigm using the documentary, theoretical and legal review. As a result, in Ecuador there is a heightened interest of companies towards the fulfillment of social responsibility, directing actions consistent with sustainable development and the declared development objectives worldwide. Despite this, greater socialization and empowerment of the regulations contemplated in the 2030 Agenda are required, to avoid the complete non-fulfillment of its objectives. It is concluded that corporate social responsibility in Ecuador responds to the Sustainable Development Goals and provides significant elements for the economic, political, social, environmental and ethical dimensions of companies, who must assume them as crosscutting axes of their management system; which will promote the development of the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".