MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252409250 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7gwb6

Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbasis Bina Desa

2019· preprint· id· W4252409250 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Mustanir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A.PendahuluanBismillahirahmanirahim...Puji syukur kita panjatkan kehadirat Allah SWT karena berkat rahmat dan hidayahnya sehingga kita di beri kesehatan dan kesempatan untuk bisa menyelesaikan laporan evaluasi akhir Mahasiswa Kuliah Kerja Lapang Plus (KKLP) STISIP Muhammadiyah Rappang Tahun 2015 Desa Tonrong RijangDan tak lupa kita haturkan shalawat dan taslim kepada junjungan Nabi Muhammad SAW, Nabi yang memperjuangkan agama islam selama 23 tahun lamanya di Mekkah dan MadinahDalam penyusunan laporan evaluasi akhir ini kami mengacu pada buku panduan profil desa, observasi serta hasil seminar perencanaan program kerja dan hasil seminar evaluasi bulanan sehingga laporan evaluasi akhir ini bisa selesai tepat pada waktunya

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207