Bibliographic record
Abstract
Revisiting memories -both lived and cinematic -from my childhood and teenage years, an era during which Hong Kong went through some of its most tumultuous trials and tribulations, was a painful experience.Furthermore, to analyse how it feels to be a Hong Konger and why it is so difficult to articulate those feelings required a level of self-honesty that was at times emotionally draining.I am therefore tremendously grateful for many people who walked me through this extraordinary journey.'Extraterritoriality' as a concept was inspired by my many conversations with my friend and mentor Thomas LaMarre, with whom I had the privilege to work at McGill University from 2010 to 2012.Its intricacies and complexities have been enriched over the years under the generous guidance of Thomas Elsaesser, the unconditional support of Dudley Andrew and Haun Saussy, and the patience and encouragement from Chris Berry.Every word of this book, in truth, is indebted to the intellectual companionship of my friend George Crosthwait.I feel incredibly honoured that in the last eight years, many filmmakers, critics and scholars whose works I discuss in this book have put every confidence in my project.Some I have met in chance encounters, whose works and words have left indelible traces on these pages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".