MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252460075 · doi:10.1017/9781108490528.005

Emergency at Midnight

2020· other· en· W4252460075 on OpenAlexaff
Kristin Plys

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMidnightMoment (physics)MeteorologyHistoryGeographyPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This was not a first journey. But how disturbing that moment after midnight —Mrityubodh, Disturbing Moment (trans. from Punjabi) In the previous chapter, I examined the Bihar Movement along with other social movements of the early 1970s that have often been blamed for the imposition of Emergency. While the Bihar Movement was certainly effective in articulating a more just and equal vision for politico-economic development in India, it was not until the Allahabad Ruling that Indira Gandhi began speaking about this social unrest as such an extreme threat to the state that it warranted the imposition of Emergency. If social unrest was truly the principal threat to law and order, Emergency should have been imposed nearly a year before, in 1974, when the Bihar Movement was at its peak, producing protests on student campuses across Bihar that were met with state violence which killed many students. The year 1974 was also the height of the Railway Workers’ Strike, which similarly provoked significant state violence and brutal repression. By the time of the Allahabad Ruling, the Bihar Movement had become more peaceful in its tactics and approach, and the railway workers had long since accepted defeat. In the several months leading up to the imposition of Emergency, the Bihar Movement had not employed violent tactics. In the weeks leading up to the Emergency, Jayprakash Narayan (JP) led several public rallies in Delhi in which he read poems that could be interpreted as critiques of the state but certainly no protests that led to violence against persons or property. The historical evidence lends more credence to the interpretation that Gandhi was responding to an attempt to oust her from office on corruption charges by suspending democracy and taking state power rather than the interpretation that she was simply reacting to violent social protest that threatened the existence of the state. While the Bihar Movement and other attendant social movements may have provided an official justification for the imposition of Emergency, the declaration of Emergency did not occur until there was a real threat that risked removing Gandhi from office.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2400.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207