MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252489568 · doi:10.17118/11143/14503

Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. Numéro 7 (printemps 2018)

2018· paratext· fr· W4252489568 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cristiana De Santis, Giuliana Fiorentino

Bibliographic record

VenueCircula · 2018
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

riconduceva a certe posizioni politiche, ideologiche e culturali la radice educativa. Questa ulteriore linea di discorso si intrecciata all'altra accentuando la vis polemica della discussione. La ricerca presenta i materiali prodotti all'interno del dibattito, ne analizza l'estremizzarsi su due posizioni forzosamente poste in toni antitetici e polemici (declino vs. progresso) e propone una lettura della vicenda in termini di 'nuovissima questione della lingua' utilizzando la cornice teorica dell'analisi del discorso e il concetto di "linguaggio autoritario".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculaSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207