MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252497502 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw019.551

P432. Patient perspectives on biosimilars: a European Federation of Crohn’s and Colitis Associations survey

2016· article· en· W4252497502 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical CentreSt. Paul's HospitalMcMaster University Medical CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Society of Intestinal Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosimilarMedicineColitisInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

duration since obtainment of faecal sample, remained significant when Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients were analysed separately. Conclusions: Our data suggest that longitudinal monitoring of FC is informative to predict relapse in IBD. By consecutive measurement of FC every third month, we quantified the risk of relapse related to FC change and observed attenuation of the risk across time. Future studies should evaluate whether early medical intervention is useful for the prevention of subsequent relapse in asymptomatic patients with elevated FC level and to address the cost-effectiveness of this monitoring regimen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207