A radial hydraulic fracture with pressure-dependent leak-off
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of a radial (or penny-shaped) hydraulic fracture propagating in a permeable reservoir. In particular, we consider the fluid exchange between the crack and ambient porous media as a pressure-dependent process. In most of the existing models, the fluid exchange process is represented as one-dimensional pressure-independent leak-off described by Carters law. We modify this mechanism by including the dependence of the fluid-exchange rate on the fluid pressure inside the fracture. The proposed approach allows the liquid not only to flow out of the fracture but also to leak-in along the region adjacent to the fracture front. The complete model for hydraulic fracturing involves several physical processes that determine the crack propagation, namely, brittle rock failure, elastic equilibrium of rock, viscous fluid flow inside the fracture channel, and fluid exchange. In order to resolve these phenomena near the fracture front in the numerical scheme, we utilise a special asymptotic multi-scale model for the near-tip region, which is used as a propagation condition for the finite fracture. The main aspect of the analysis is a comparison of fracture characteristics such as aperture profile, radius and others calculated via the proposed model with the results of the radial fracture model that assumes standard pressure-independent fluid exchange mechanism governed by Carters law. Based on the comparison, we determine parameter ranges, for which the effect of the pressure-dependent fluid exchange mechanism is essential, and, on the other hand, outline zones for which Carters leak-off model provides accurate results. Finally, by using an approximate solution for the radial fracture with Carters leak-off, we perform estimates of the effect for the entire parametric space, which allows one to evaluate the influence of the pressure-dependent leak-off for any problem parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".