MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252501800 · doi:10.1080/07060660009500480

Prevalence of fungi and fusariotoxins on oat seed from western Canada, 1995-1997

2000· article· en· W4252501800 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R. M. Clear, Susan K. Patrick, Don Gaba

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlternaria alternataBipolarisDrechsleraAvenaCropBiologyFusariumAlternariaAgronomyCladosporiumHorticultureBotanyPenicillium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mycoflora and levels of deoxynivalenol (DON) on oat seed (Avena sativa) grown in western Canada was determined by analyzing a total of 511 grain samples collected from 39 crop districts in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba during 1995-1997. Fungi representing a minimum of 85 species were recovered. Alternaria alternata was the most frequently isolated species from each province. Levels of A. alternata, Bipolaris sorokiniana, and Fusarium graminearum were highest in Manitoba and eastern Saskatchewan, whereas Cladosporium species and Drechslera avenacea were highest in samples from Alberta and western Saskatchewan. DON levels ≥ 0.10 ppm were found in seeds from two Manitoba crop districts in 1996 and three in 1997, with a maximum level of 0.34 ppm. In 1997, DON was also detected in composite samples of seed from three Saskatchewan and two Alberta crop district composites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207