MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4252527004 · doi:10.1002/qsar.200590050

Literature Highlights in Combinatorial Science: QSAR Comb. Sci. 9/2005

2005· article· en· W4252527004 on OpenAlex
Dirk Strübing, Helfried Neumann, S Simon Hübner, S. Klaus, Matthias Beller, Jian Zhang, Li Zhang, Sam Zhang, Yu Wang, Gang Liu, Justyna A. Grzyb, Mark A. Dekeyser, Robert A. Batey, Xuemin Shen, G Neckers, Linda Blake, H Holzbeierlein, J.D. Cronk, Brian S. J. Blagg, A. Olszewski, Glen J. Weiss

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSAR & Combinatorial Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative structure–activity relationshipCitationComputer scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance: A H-cube apparatus was used in heterogeneous hydrogenation under continuous flow conditions. With dihydropyrimidines obtained from the Biginelli condensation, nitro reduction, benzyl ester deprotection and Raney nickel desulfurization were all demonstrated. Products were prepared in > 100 mg scale in 30 minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it