Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined children's socioeconomic neurogradients of selective attention.Indices of contextual socioeconomic family status (SES) and early development experience, the Early Development Instrument (EDI), were related to behavioural and neural correlates of an auditory oddball task in a sample including 52 preadolescent children (Aged 12-14 years) stratified according to SES: High (n = 14), Middle (n = 20), and Low (n = 18).Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while children were asked to emit or withhold response to a series of rare/frequent and target/distracter tones.Despite SES-dependent differences in midline ERPs, children from the High-and Low-SES showed similar behavioural patterns with high performance.However, the Mid-SES group showed a markedly different performance pattern than their High-SES counterpart, correlated with differences in both ERP and EDI measurements.Confirming the joint role of SES and early childhood, these findings further our understanding of neuroimaging data across diverse experiential developmental contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".