Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malignant hyperthermia (MH), a potentially fatal hypermetabolic reaction, is a genetic disorder of skeletal muscle.1–8 The triggers for the hypermetabolic reaction are some anesthetics and muscle relaxants, or extreme stress in the form of heat or exercise.4–6 If recognized early, the MH reaction can be reversed by the administration of dantrolene, a muscle relaxant, in addition to medical treatment such as cooling and hyperventilation.1 Unfortunately, by the time the condition is recognized, the individual may have experienced extensive muscle damage (rhabdomyolysis) due to sustained muscle rigidity9 and, therefore, have muscle pain and weakness and decreased range of motion (ROM) in the affected extremities.10 Physical therapists may encounter clients with MH in a variety of settings such as on sports fields, in the clinic, and in intensive care units. Understanding the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and medical management of MH should provide the basis for physical therapy management of this complicated and intriguing disorder. There is a paucity of literature, however, regarding physical therapy treatment of MH. The purpose of this article is to increase awareness for physical therapy practitioners about MH in susceptible clients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".